That’s all fir now

Balsam Fir

During the winter, each month, it seems, comes with its own affliction. I just got through the January Itch, and now I’m facing the February Slump. January is the time of the winter when I first start tiring of the cold and the snow and the relatively depauperate faunal landscape. It’s January when I typically do foolish things such as start up a nature blog or invent other projects for myself. By February, I’m nearly burnt out with winter. By February, I’m starting to struggle for blog fodder, but I’m also struggling for the enthusiasm to search for blog fodder. Mostly I’d prefer to curl up in front of the fire with a good book and wait for spring to arrive. The groundhog usually tells us there’s six more weeks of winter, which isn’t terribly surprising, because spring usually arrives sometime around mid-March up here. That’s when we can start expecting the first really prolonged thaws, though we might have a day or two, here and there, of mild temperatures prior to that.

That’s a long way of saying, please forgive me if my posts are a little sparser this month than they usually are. I promise they’ll start to pick up again when I catch March Madness with the mild weather next month. (Jason – please note overly wordy introduction that has nothing to do with main post subject.)

I dug through some of my archived photos looking for something I hadn’t posted yet. Fortunately, I always have a backlog of things. These photos were taken on January 15, but the great thing about trees is that I could go out tomorrow and get nearly exactly the same photos. So timing doesn’t tend to matter as much with trees, at least not in this season.

I walk past this patch of trees on most visits to the 100-acre woods. When I first discovered it, I thought it was Black Spruce. I’d seen Black Spruce in only a couple of locations before: in northern Ontario when I drove along Highway 11 on one of my trips west, it’s the predominant species along the highways there; and in the fen at Rock Ridge. It’s not a lot of experience to draw from, but hey, it’s what I’ve got. What I remembered about them was mostly that they were very narrow trees, almost spindly. Many, though not all, of them had round clumps at their top. But it was the narrow spindly that really stuck with me, they were the only evergreen I knew that grew narrow spindly. So I saw these, and they were very tall, narrow, sort of spindly spruce-like trees. So naturally I assumed they were Black Spruce.

Balsam Fir

Now, I’ll be the first to admit that I’m far from being a plant expert. I specifically majored in Zoology and not Botany in university so that I wouldn’t have to learn all that boring plant crap. Turned out a lot of what I learned was boring animal crap and it probably wouldn’t have mattered all that much. In retrospect, I’m pretty sure it was just the environment that made it boring. I find plants much more interesting now than I did then, but that’s probably because I’m learning it all on my terms. And I don’t have to regurgitate it on an exam.

So not being a plant expert, it escaped my notice for nigh on half a year that these were not, in fact, Black Spruce (you’d think the fact that they weren’t growing in wet habitat might’ve tipped me off but no, I just labeled it unusual). Finally, in January, it occurred to me to go over and take a closer look. And wouldn’t you know it: not spruce. So then the question becomes, well, what are they then?

Balsam Fir

Although there are clues in the needles, the most definitive feature was the trunk. Those narrow, colourful spots that seem to go around the trunk in circular bands are diagnostic of Balsam Fir. You can’t see it as much on the front tree, but on the rear trunk you can also see some of them are raised. These bumps are “resin blisters”, pockets of pitch that form just under the surface of the bark. It’s possible to pop these just with your finger, releasing the sticky substance inside. I’m not clear on why the tree creates pockets of the stuff, but the pitch is used basically the same way as in other species: defense against intruding insects or infections, and to speed closure of wounds.

Balsam Fir
Balsam Fir - no stalks

Balsam Fir are found through the Boreal forest, from northern Alberta east to Newfoundland and Labrador, and south through southern Ontario into the northern states. Given that they’re not restricted to the Shield, I don’t know why I’d never encountered one “in the wild” before (they are, of course, popular Christmas trees, but they’re more expensive than the pines or spruce – perhaps they grow more slowly – and so we never got them, usually opting for spruce). My suspicion is that I was mistaking them for Eastern Hemlock, which look superficially similar. I guess I never really took a close look at the needles, or paid much attention to the trunks. If I’d looked at the trunks, I’d’ve realized that firs have smooth, spotted trunks, spruces have slightly scaly trunks, and hemlocks have ridged trunks. Seems pretty easy now that I know.

Eastern Hemlock
Eastern Hemlock - narrow stalks

The needles of spruce come out of the twig from both top and bottom, while hemlock and fir are either flat, or (sometimes with fir, it appears) only on the top half of the twig. The difference between hemlock needles and fir needles is in their length (fir are longer) and their “stalks”, the narrow bit that attaches the needle to the twig. In firs (previous photo) this stalk is not much narrower than the leaf itself, while in hemlocks (above photo) there is a distinct, thin stalk at the base of the needle. (Sorry for the quality of this image, sure looked like it was in focus on the LCD screen). There seems to often be a slight different in colour, too, with firs a yellow-green and hemlocks a forest green or grass green, as you can see in this convenient side-by-side comparison, below, though this probably is affected by local conditions and individual variation, too.

Balsam Fir (front) and Eastern Hemlock (rear)
Balsam Fir (front) and Eastern Hemlock (rear)

Balsam Fir, it turns out, has a lot of uses. Christmas trees are one, of course, and the wood is often harvested and sold as lumber, either under its own label or sometimes lumped in with spruce.

The pitch apparently has antiseptic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties and was used by Native Americans as both topical salves for wounds or chapped lips, and as a tea infusion for internal ailments, particularly colds and flus but also other health problems like infections or arthritis. I gather that, should you cut yourself while out in the woods, you can apply Balsam Fir pitch directly to the wound and it will seal it and help it heal.

It can also make a great fire-starter; pitch smeared on damp wood will burn for an extended period, often long enough to dry out the wood enough to allow it to catch. I saw a mention of its use as a fly trap, smeared on the back of, say, a hard hat where it will catch deer flies when they come to land. Plus it would smell lovely at the same time. Wikipedia mentioned the oil could be used as a natural rodent repellent. It also said the pitch can be used in the preparation of permanent microscope slide mounts (that is, place a dab of pitch on the slide, over your specimen, and add another slide or a cover; the pitch will dry clear and hard and preserve the specimen). Wikipedia also implied (the wording is a bit fuzzy) that historically some binoculars used Balsam Fir pitch to glue the lenses in place.

Balsam Fir

Now that I’m finally aware of the presence of the species around here, I wonder where else I may have seen it and simply written it off as spruce or hemlock. Was there fir around the lake house? Our MAPS stations? The bark pattern looks familiar, but I can’t be certain, now. Something to watch for in the future.

Snow spiders

Ground Spider (Gnaphosidae); Gnaphosa sp?

Earlier this week, on a mild afternoon, I was working on my computer while Dan had taken Raven out for some exercise. I was startled by a sharp rap on my window. When I peered out, Dan was gesturing for me to come down: he’d found something he thought I might be interested in.

It turned out to be a spider, curled up on the surface of the snow. It was less than a centimetre long with all its legs tucked in to its body, and how he spotted it I don’t know. It was out in the middle of the milkweed fields, so I can only presume that it came out of one of the milkweed pods, or maybe up through a hole in the snow at the base of one of the stems. It would have been a long way for it to walk from other potential origins.

Ground Spider (Gnaphosidae); Gnaphosa sp?

I started out trying to ID it by going to BugGuide.net and doing a search for “snow spider”. And lo and behold, there it was! Along with quite a number of other spiders on snow. I’m fairly certain this is a Ground Spider, family Gnaphosidae, maybe in the genus Gnaphosa, and could possibly be G. parvula. I make this identification based on the dimples/pale spots in the slightly-flattened top of the abdomen (others I looked at had rounder abdomens and/or lacked dimples). Another possibility that occurs in our area is G. muscorum, except that’s supposed to have a pale patch at the front/top of the abdomen. Really, though, I’m waiting for its identification by an expert at BugGuide.

In the meantime, while looking up whether Gnaphosa sp. are even active in the winter, I found this pdf article called the Phenology of Winter-active Spiders. The opening sentence states that there are 54 species of winter-active spiders in southern central Canada (the author was from Manitoba) and the article discusses the life cycle of each. The only Gnaphosa he mentions is G. muscorum, and all of his specimens for the species were collected in May-June-July (though all the species in his report are ones that are supposed to be active in the winter). So I may have to wait for an ID on BugGuide.

Thinlegged Wolf Spider (Pardosa sp)

I ran off a few photos of Dan’s spider, then started walking back to the house. As I returned, I kept an eye on the ground, to see if any other critters might pop up (recalling also the caterpillar from a few weeks ago). No caterpillars, but I did find a second spider. Assuming it was the same as the first, I just ran off a few shots with the idea of posting one on the blog, following the first and saying “hey look, I found another.” When I got the photos uploaded onto my computer and looked at the spiders at about 20 times life size, I became pretty certain that they weren’t the same species. Their cephalothoraxes (the heads) weren’t the same shape, for one thing. The second one’s legs were thinner than the first’s. Hmm…

Looking more closely at my selection of “snow spider” results, I spotted this species in there as well. This is a Thin-legged Wolf Spider, belonging to the genus Pardosa. There are two genera that look very similar, and can be told apart by the presence or absence of a dark V on the cephalothorax. It’s absent on this one, therefore it’s Pardosa. The pdf mentioned above also had two Pardosa species listed. Neither of them were encountered in the winter, either.

Long-bodied Cellar Spider (Pholcus phalangioides)

This spider wasn’t found out on the snow, it came in on a piece of firewood. Dan also found this one and called me downstairs to see if I was interested. It’d probably been quite happily tucked away in the stacks of firewood in the garden “shed”. Very long-legged and delicate-looking, this is a Long-bodied Cellar Spider, Pholcus phalangioides, and is one of the most common household spiders. Originally native to the tropics, it’s now found in much of the world. It’s often one of the most abundant in any given house (or cellar, or woodshed). They build webs, and when disturbed will shake their web violently in an attempt to startle or confuse predators.

Their long-legged nature really only confuses them with one other type of arachnid, the harvestman, frequently called “daddy-long-legs”, although it turns out that both of these arachnids are sometimes known by that latter name. The specific name of the cellar spider, phalangioides, originates from the roots Phalangium (the genus containing harvestmen) and “-oides” which is Greek for “similar to” or “resembling”.

Long-bodied Cellar Spider (Pholcus phalangioides)

Cellar spiders are great for pest control. In particular, they will prey on other spiders, often species that are much bigger than they are. I found one comment on BugGuide suggesting that this would be a useful thing for folks living in Arizona and other places where venomous spiders may be a consideration. Encourage the cellar spiders to set up shop and it’ll help keep your other spider populations down! When food is scarce, they’ll turn cannibalistic, feeding on others of their species.

Here’s a neat series of shots submitted to BugGuide, of a cellar spider and its prey, which the photographer unwrapped and cleaned to see what it was.

Tree beards

Usnea lichen

Not far from the tree with the beetle engravings I discovered one with a tiny poof of lichen. Just the one, on a small tree that could even have been a long-dead sapling; there were no others near it, or even in the immediate area, that I could spot. I found this curious. At first I thought it was perhaps a reindeer lichen that had been picked up and dropped there by some animal, but when I picked it up it seemed to have grown around the twig, with a distinct groove down the centre. I ran off several shots, but lichens are a tough bunch to decipher, and I didn’t really know for sure what I was looking at.

Usnea lichen

I carried on up the trail, and a short distance later came upon some thick fruit-bearing trees, perhaps crabapples. I’d walked by these trees dozens of times before, and never noticed anything remarkable. But for whatever reason, that day something caught my eye: fuzzy patches of green lichen growing from their trunks. Whereas there’d just been the one on that first little tree, here there were dozens. None of them were very big, even the largest was not much larger than a tennis ball. Most were only half that size. They were very delicate and fine, almost hairlike. I had more of a suspicion as to the identity of these, but it would require returning home to ask the internet (my god is named Google; Google will provide).

Usnea lichen

I am fairly certain that these are Usnea sp., also known as Old Man’s Beard (which may refer to one of many species of Usnea lichen), or at the very least the latter bunch on the crabapples are. I’m not completely sure about the first one, I would probably need to go back to check out additional characteristics. Usnea lichens typically grow from the branches or trunks of trees, and are always fruticose – that is, highly branching. Some species grow more thickly than others, and some have broad flat bits that remind me a bit of opened venus fly trap jaws. There are a number of species that grow in Ontario, but I think this one might be Usnea subfloridana, a particularly filamentous species but one that doesn’t typically grow very large or long. Some species can grow very long, a foot or more, and completely cloak the branches of a tree.

Usnea lichen

All lichens are susceptible to air pollution, but Usnea lichens are especially so. They’re one of the first types of lichen to disappear with air pollution. Even when they persist, they may not grow more than a few millimeters. Their presence here is likely an indication of reasonably clear air quality.

When I think of Usnea, I typically think of Northern Parula warblers. Parulas are almost entirely dependent on long, draping species of Usnea for their nests. They don’t just use the lichen in the nest, the lichen is the nest. They’ll find a nice thick clump of the stuff and hollow out the inside. They don’t even always line it. Because the sort of Usnea the parula prefers mostly occurs in the coniferous forests of the Canadian Sheild, the bird is rare in southern Ontario. We’re right at the edge of the Shield here, but I don’t think these little puffs are going to cut it.

Usnea lichen

Most Usnea lichens, along with a few others such as reindeer lichen, contain usnic acid, a bitter-tasting molecule believed to be used to deter animals that might browse on the lichen (apparently it doesn’t deter the reindeer). It also happens to be a very potent antibiotic and antifungal agent, and is high in vitamin C. These latter properties resulted in it being a common medicinal agent used by Native Americans to treat infections – both internally, as a tea, and externally, as a compress on wounds. The fine, branching nature of the lichen also made it a good substitute for gauze. In modern day herbal medicine it is often used in teas or other products intended to treat respiratory and urinary tract infections.

All good things to know if I find myself lost and sick in the northern woods…